English / ქართული / русский /







Journal number 2 ∘ Alfred Kuratashvili
SOCIALISM WITH CHINESE SPECIFICITY – IT IS NOT CAPITALISM AND NOT MARXISM-LENINISM, BUT A CREATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF STALIN’S ADMINISTRATIVE SOCIALISM

Expanded Summary 

The scientific work examines in a fundamentally new way Socialism with Chinese specificity, which, according to the scientifically substantiated statement of the author, is not only no not capitalism, as erroneously seems (or may seem) to some representatives of science and politics, traditionally not understanding the true essence of capitalism, but it is not also the implementation of Marxism-Leninism in practice, because Marxism-Leninism, again according to the scientifically substantiated statement of the author, is a clear utopia.

In particular, the existence and active use of private property, the market, commodity-money relations in the People's Republic of China, for some representatives of science and politics who mistakenly understand the true essence of capitalism, it seems that the capitalist system is functioning in China, since the presence in the state of private property, the market, commodity-money relations seems to them an indicator of the capitalism of the state system.

In reality, the main and determining criterion of capitalism, according to the scientifically substantiated statement of the author, is the dominance of money, market, profit, capital over a person in society and in the state, i.e. the main and determining criterion of capitalism is domination in society and in the state of economic fascism, which fundamentally contradicts the focus of the functioning of the People’s Republic of China.

As for the fact that Socialism with Chinese specificity, again, according to the scientifically substantiated statement of the author, is not the implementation of Marxism-Leninism in practice, because Marxism-Leninism is a clear utopia, it must be noted that utopianism is the impracticability of Marxism-Leninism, the author proves that the so-called Marxist “scientific socialism” and Marxism-Leninism as a whole meant the destruction of private ownership of the means of production, the destruction of the market, commodity-money relations, as well as the destruction of the exchange of producers of their products, which certainly represents a clear utopia.

Moreover, the Marxist-Leninist understanding of socialism, according to the scientifically substantiated statement of the author, does not apply to the People’s Republic of China, and, in particular, to Socialism with Chinese specificity.

Moreover, the political system of China is precisely Socialism with Chinese specificity, and not the Communist political system, for Communism, like Utopian Socialism, is a clear utopia.

Thus, it is confirmed that Socialism with Chinese specificity is not only not capitalism, but also not a practical implementation of Marxism-Leninism, because Marxism-Leninism is a clear utopia.

Consequently, Socialism with Chinese specificity is the creative development of Stalin's Administrative Socialism, for although I.V. Stalin verbally based on Marxism-Leninism, and he himself was considered a classic of Marxism-Leninism, but in reality I.V. Stalin carried out a revolutionary coup of Marxism-Leninism – by admitting a market, commodity-money relations under socialism, as evidenced by the fact that the Stalin Constitution of the USSR of 1936, which is also called the “Constitution of Victorious Socialism,” recorded the Victory of the Foundations of Socialism, and this is when commodity-money relations were allowed and functioned.

It is the above fact that indicates that I.V. Stalin created his “ism” –  Stalinism, by building a fundamentally new type of socialism, which the author of this scientific work called – Stalin’s Administrative Socialism, and it is the creative development of Stalin’s Administrative Socialism that is Socialism with Chinese specificity.

In the future, socialism with Chinese specificity, proceeding from the interests of the people, should go (andactuallyalreadycoming) along the path of building a Humanosocial (Truly Human) society and state.