Expanded Summary. 

In scientific work, scientific creativity is considered as the main criterion for effective competitiveness and as a necessary basis for sociall-economic progress.

It should be specially noted that without education there can be no true science, but without scientific creativity the development of science itself is impossible, and, therefore, the development of education, society, the state and humanity as a whole is impossible.

That is why, scientific creativity must be considered – as the main criterion for effective competitiveness, because without scientific creativity it is impossible to achieve an advantage in the competition, and therefore it is impossible to achieve real social-economic progress.

Consequently, scientific creativity is quite logical and it is naturally to consider – as a necessary basis for social-economic progress on a global scale.

At the same time, this scientific work considers the “killing” of science as a result of misunderstanding and / or ignoring true scientific creativity – as a brake on the path of social-economic progress, and as a crime against humanity (?!).

A deep crisis in scientific work in the field of social sciences and in public administration policy is regarded as the determining cause of all the negative that is happening in the modern world (?!).

Particular attention is paid to the classification of representatives of the sphere of science created by the author and the World Cup for scientific creativity proposed by him in the field of social sciences, as the main mechanisms for solving the problem of scientific creativity – as a necessary basis for the effective functioning of society, the state and humanity as a whole.

The scientific work also draws attention to the fact that as a result of the lack of real criteria for assessing the “activity” of representatives of the social sciences, science ( first of all as the field of social sciences) has become, to a certain extent, a “feeding trough”, where you can often find stupid "Rogues" – "Intellectual" "impotents" in science, which, in accordance with the classification of representatives of the sphere of science created by me, is actually the same as "Buffalo in the theater" (?!).

The “intellectual” “impotent” in science is an “impotent”, from the point of view of the person’s lack of creative thinking, i.e. an “intellectual” “impotent” in science is a stillborn from the point of view of creative thinking, but at the same time a “skilled” “rogue” in the field of social sciences, who is sometimes “declared” as a “true” “scientist” (?!).

Therefore, to overcome the “egalitarianism” in the field of social sciences, to clarify and determine Who is Who in science in general, and, in particular, Who is Who in the field of social sciences,fundamental importance is from the point of view of the need for social-economic progress, from the point of view of the need to protect the interests of society, the state and humanity as a whole, the classification of representatives of the spheres of science created by me many years ago, as well as a proposed by me the World Cup on scientific work in the field of social sciences.

The main novelty of scientific research is the consideration of scientific creativity – as the main criterion for effective competitiveness and the necessary basis for social-economic progress, and the consideration of the Classification of representatives of the sphere of science that I created and the World Cup of Scientific Creativity in the field of social sciences that I proposed as the main mechanisms for solving the problem of scientific creativity – as a necessary basis for the effective functioning of society, the state and humanity as a whole.